This page documents the ActivitySim software design and how to contribute to the project.
The core software components of ActivitySim are described below. ActivitySim is implemented in Python, and makes heavy use of the vectorized backend C/C++ libraries in pandas and numpy in order to be quite performant. The core design principle of the system is vectorization of for loops, and this principle is woven into the system wherever reasonable. As a result, the Python portions of the software can be thought of as more of an orchestrator, data processor, etc. that integrates a series of C/C++ vectorized data table and matrix operations. The model system formulates each simulation as a series of vectorized table operations and the Python layer is responsible for setting up and providing expressions to operate on these large data tables.
In developing this software platform, we strive to adhere to a best practices approach to scientific computing, as summarized in this article.
An ActivitySim model is a sequence of model / data processing steps, commonly known as a data pipeline. A well defined data pipeline has the ability to resume jobs at a known point, which facilitates debugging of problems with data and/or calculations. It also allows for checkpointing model resources, such as the state of each person at a point in the model simulation. Checkpointing also allows for regression testing of results at specified points in overall model run.
Earlier versions of ActivitySim depended on ORCA, an orchestration/pipeline tool
that defines model steps, dynamic data sources, and connects them to processing functions. ORCA defined dynamic data tables
based on pandas DataFrames, columns based on pandas Series, and injectables (functions). Model steps
were executed as steps registered with the ORCA engine. Over time ActivitySim has extended ORCA’s functionality by
adding a Pipeline that runs a series of model steps, manages the state of the data
tables throughout the model run, allows for restarting at any model step, and integrates with the
random number generation procedures (see Random). As a result, ORCA is no longer a dependency of
the system. See
activitysim.core.inject for more information.
ActivitySim works with three open data formats, HDF5 , Open Matrix (OMX), and CSV . The HDF5 binary data container is used for the Pipeline data store. OMX, which is based on HDF5, is used for input and output matrices (skims and demand matrices). CSV files are used for various inputs and outputs as well.
Three key data structures in ActivitySim are:
pandas.DataFrame - A data table with rows and columns, similar to an R data frame, Excel worksheet, or database table
pandas.Series - a vector of data, a column in a DataFrame table or a 1D array
numpy.array - an N-dimensional array of items of the same type, and is often a network skim matrix or collection of skim matrices by time-period or mode for example
ActivitySim exposes all model expressions in CSV files. These model expression CSV files contain Python expressions, mainly pandas/numpy expression, and reference input data tables and network skim matrices. With this design, the Python code, which can be thought of as a generic expression engine, and the specific model calculations, such as the utilities, are separate. This helps to avoid modifying the actual Python code when making changes to the models, such as during model calibration. An example of model expressions is found in the example auto ownership model specification file - auto_ownership.csv. Refer to the Utility Expressions section for more detail.
Many of the models have pre- and post-processor table annotators, which read a CSV file of expression, calculate
required additional table fields, and join the fields to the target tables. An example table annotation expressions
file is found in the example configuration files for households for the CDAP model -
Refer to Estimation for more information and the
ActivitySim currently supports multinomial (MNL) and nested logit (NL) choice models. Refer to Logit for more information. It also supports custom expressions as noted above, which can often be used to code additional types of choice models. In addition, developers can write their own choice models in Python and expose these through the framework.
Person Time Windows¶
The departure time and duration models require person time windows. Time windows are adjacent time periods that are available for travel. ActivitySim maintains time windows in a pandas table where each row is a person and each time period is a column. As travel is scheduled throughout the simulation, the relevant columns for the tour, trip, etc. are updated as needed. Refer to Person Time Windows for more information.
An activitysim travel model is made up of a series of models, or steps in the data pipeline. A model typically does the following:
registers an ORCA step that is called by the model runner
sets up logging and tracing
gets the relevant input data tables from ORCA
gets all required settings, config files, etc.
runs a data preprocessor on each input table that needs additional fields for the calculation
solves the model in chunks of data table rows
runs a data postprocessor on the output table data that needs additional fields for later models
writes the resulting table data to the pipeline
See Models for more information.
The development version of ActivitySim can be installed as follows:
Clone or fork the source from the GitHub repository
Activate the correct conda environment if needed
Navigate to your local activitysim git directory
Run the command
python setup.py develop
develop command is required in order to make changes to the
source and see the results without reinstalling. You may need to first uninstall the
the pip installed version before installing the development version from source. This is
pip uninstall activitysim.
ActivitySim development adheres to the following standards.
Imports should be one per line.
Imports should be grouped into standard library, third-party, and intra-library imports.
fromimport should follow regular
Within each group the imports should be alphabetized.
Imports of scientific Python libraries should follow these conventions:
import numpy as np import pandas as pd
Working Together in the Repository¶
We use GitHub Flow. The key points to our GitHub workflow are:
The master branch contains the latest working/release version of the ActivitySim resources
The master branch is protected and therefore can only be written to by the Travis CI system
Work is done in an issue/feature branch (or a fork) and then pushed to a new branch
The test system automatically runs the tests on the new branch
If the tests pass, then a manual pull request can be approved to merge into master
The repository administrator handles the pull request and makes sure that related resources such as the wiki, documentation, issues, etc. are updated. See Releases for more information.
ActivitySim uses the following versioning convention
where MAJOR designates a major revision number for the software, like 2 or 3 for Python. Usually, raising a major revision number means that you are adding a lot of features, breaking backward-compatibility or drastically changing the APIs (Application Program Interface) or ABIs (Application Binary Interface).
MINOR usually groups moderate changes to the software like bug fixes or minor improvements. Most of the time, end users can upgrade with no risks their software to a new minor release. In case an API changes, the end users will be notified with deprecation warnings. In other words, API and ABI stability is usually a promise between two minor releases.
ActivitySim testing is done with three tools:
pycodestyle, a tool to check Python code against the pycodestyle style conventions
pytest, a Python testing tool
coveralls, a tool for measuring code coverage and publishing code coverage stats online
To run the tests locally, first make sure the required packages are installed:
pip install pytest pytest-cov coveralls pycodestyle
Next, run the tests with the following commands:
pycodestyle activitysim py.test --cov activitysim --cov-report term-missing
These same tests are run by Travis with each push to the repository. These tests need to pass in order to merge the revisions into master.
In some cases, test targets need to be updated to match the new results produced by the code since these are now the correct results. In order to update the test targets, first determine which tests are failing and then review the failing lines in the source files. These are easy to identify since each test ultimately comes down to one of Python’s various types of assert statements. Once you identify which assert is failing, you can work your way back through the code that creates the test targets in order to update it. After updating the test targets, re-run the tests to confirm the new code passes all the tests.
See Adding Agency Examples for more information on testing, most notably, agency example models.
A handy way to profile ActivitySim model runs is to use snakeviz. To do so, first install snakeviz and then run ActivitySim with the Python profiler (cProfile) to create a profiler file. Then run snakeviz on the profiler file to interactively explore the component runtimes.
The documentation is written in reStructuredText markup and built with Sphinx. In addition to converting rst files to html and other document formats, these tools also read the inline Python docstrings and convert them into html as well. ActivitySim’s docstrings are written in numpydoc format since it is easier to use than standard rst format.
To build the documentation, first make sure the required packages are installed:
pip install sphinx numpydoc sphinx_rtd_theme
Next, build the documentation in html format with the following command run from the
If the activitysim package is installed, then the documentation will be built from that version of
the source code instead of the git repo version. Make sure to
pip uninstall activitysim before
building the documentation if needed.
When pushing revisions to the repo, the documentation is automatically built by Travis after
successfully passing the tests. The documents are built with the
The script does the following:
installs the required python packages
../activitysim/docs/_build/html/*pages to the
GitHub automatically publishes the gh-pages branch at https://activitysim.github.io/activitysim.
Before releasing a new version of ActivitySim, the following release checklist should be consulted:
Create the required Anaconda environment
Run all the examples, including the full scale examples
Test the tutorial notebooks
Build the package
Install and run the package in a new Anaconda environment
Build the documentation
Run the tests
Increment the package version number
Update any necessary web links, such as switching from the develop branch to the master branch
Contribution Review Criteria¶
When contributing to ActivitySim, the set of questions below will be asked of the contribution. Make sure to also review the documentation above before making a submittal. The automated test system also provides some helpful information where identified.
To submit a contribution for review, issue a pull request with a comment introducing your contribution. The comment should include a brief overview, responses to the questions, and pointers to related information. The entire submittal should ideally be self contained so any additional documentation should be in the pull request as well. The PMC and/or its Contractor will handle the review request, comment on each question, complete the feedback form, and reply to the pull request. If accepted, the commit(s) will be squashed and merged. Its a good idea to setup a pre-submittal meeting to discuss questions and better understand expectations.
Does it contain all the required elements, including a runnable example, documentation, and tests?
Does it implement good methods (i.e. is it consistent with good practices in travel modeling)?
Are the runtimes reasonable and does it provide documentation justifying this claim?
Does it include non-Python code, such as C/C++? If so, does it compile on any OS and are compilation instructions included?
Is it licensed with the ActivitySim license that allows the code to be freely distributed and modified and includes attribution so that the provenance of the code can be tracked? Does it include an official release of ownership from the funding agency if applicable?
Does it appropriately interact with the data pipeline (i.e. it doesn’t create new ways of managing data)?
Does it include regression tests to enable checking that consistent results will be returned when updates are made to the framework?
Does it include sufficient test coverage and test data for existing and proposed features?
Any other comments or suggestions for improving the developer experience?
The PMC and/or its Contractor will provide feedback for each review criteria above and tag each submittal category as follows:
Accept but recommend revisions
Do not accept
Adding Agency Examples¶
ActivitySim includes several mature or in-development full scale agency Examples. Adding an agency example to ActivitySim adds additional assurances that future updates to ActivitySim will more easily work for users. At the same time, with each additional implementation, the need for additional test coverage increases. This increased need for test coverage relates to when setting up a new model, with differences in inputs and configurations, when adding new model components (and/or revisions to the core) in order to implement new features, and when implementing model components at a scale previously untested. The following section describes the process to add an agency example model to ActivitySim.
Generally speaking, there are two types of ActivitySim examples: test examples and agency examples.
Test examples - these are the core ActivitySim maintained and tested examples developed to date. The current test examples are example_mtc, example_estimation, example_multiple_zones, and example_marin. These examples are owned and maintained by the project.
Agency examples - these are agency partner model implementations currently being setup. The current agency examples are example_arc, example_semcog, example_psrc, and example_sandag. These examples can be configured in ways different from the test examples, include new inputs and expressions, and may include new planned software components for contribution to ActivitySim. These examples are owned by the agency.
Furthermore, multiple versions of these examples can exist, and be used for various testing purposes:
Full scale - a full scale data setup, including all households, zones, skims, time periods, etc. This is a “typical” model setup used for application. This setup can be used to test the model results and performance since model results can be compared to observed/known answers and runtimes can be compared to industry experience. It can also be used to test core software functionality such as tracing and repeatability.
Cropped - a subset of households and zones for efficient / portable running for testing. This setup can really only be used to test the software since model results are difficult to compare to observed/known answers. This version of an example is not recommended for testing overall runtime since it’s a convenience sample and may not represent the true regional model travel demand patterns. However, depending on the question, this setup may be able to answer questions related to runtime, such as improvements to methods indifferent to the size of the population and number of zones.
Other - a specific route/path through the code for testing. For example, the estimation example tests the estimation mode functionality. The estimation example is a version of the example mtc example - it inherits most settings from example mtc and includes additional settings for reading in survey files and producing estimation data bundles.
The test plan for test examples versus agency examples is different:
Test examples test software features such as stability, tracing, expression solving, etc. This set of tests is run by the TravisCI system and is a central feature of the software development process.
Agency examples test a complete run of the cropped version to ensure it runs and the results are as expected. This is done via a simple run model test that runs the cropped version and compares the output trip list to the expected trip list. This is what is known as a regression test. This test is also run by TravisCI.
Both types of examples are stored in the ActivitySim repositories for version control and collaborative maintenance. There are two storage locations:
The activitysim package example folder, which stores the test and agency example setup files, cropped data and cropping script, regression test script, expected results, and a change log to track any revisions to the example to get it working for testing. These resources are the resources automatically tested by the TravisCI test system with each revision to the software.
The activitysim_resources repository, which stores just the full scale example data inputs using Git LFS. This repository has a monthly cost and takes time to upload/download and so the contents of it are separate from the main software repository. These resources are the resources periodically and manually tested (for now).
This two-part solution allows for the main activitysim repo to remain relatively lightweight, while providing an organized and accessible storage solution for the full scale example data. The ActivitySim command line interface for creating and running examples makes uses the example_manifest.yaml to maintain the dictionary of the examples and how to get and run them.
Running the Test System¶
The automatic TravisCI test system runs the test examples and the cropped agency examples. Examples of the testing resources for each agency example that need to be up-to-date are:
For the time being, running the full scale examples is done manually since it involves getting and running several large examples that take many hours to run. The entire system could be fully automated, and either run in the cloud or on a local server.
Update Use Cases¶
To better illustrate the workflow for adding agency examples, a series of use cases is discussed.
When a new version of the code is pushed to develop:
The automatic test system is run to ensure the tests associated with the test examples pass. If any of the tests do not pass, then either the code or the expected test results are updated until the tests pass.
The automatic test system also runs each cropped agency example regression test to ensure the model runs and produces the same results as before. If any of the tests do not pass, then either the code or the expected test results are updated until the tests pass. However, the process for resolving issues with agency example test failure has two parts:
If the agency example previous ran without error or future warnings (i.e. deprecation warnings and is therefore up-to-date), then the developer will be responsible for updating the agency example so it passes the tests
If the agency example previously threw errors or future warnings (i.e. is not up-to-date), then the developer will not update the example and the responsibility will fall to the agency to update it when they have time. This will not preclude development from advancing since the agency specific test can fail while the other tests continue to pass. If the agency example is not updated within an agreed upon time frame, then the example is removed from the test system.
To help understand this case, the addition of support for representative logsums to example_mtc is discussed. Example_mtc was selected as the test case for development of this feature because this feature could be implemented and tested against this example, which is the primary example to date. With the new feature configured for this example, the automatic test system was run to ensure all the existing test examples pass their tests. The automatic test system was also run to ensure all the cropped agency examples passed their tests, but since not of them include this new feature in their configuration, the test results were the same and therefore the tests passed.
When an agency wants to update their example:
It is recommended that agencies keep their examples up-to-date to minimize the cost/effort of updating to new versions of ActivitySim. However, the frequency with which to make that update is a key issue. The recommended frequency of ensuring the agency example is up-to-date depends on the ActivitySim development roadmap/phasing and the current features being developed. Based on past project experience, it probably makes sense to not let agency examples fall more than a few months behind schedule, or else updates can get onerous.
When making an agency model update, agencies update their example through a pull request. This pull request changes nothing outside their example folder. The updated resources may include updated configs, inputs, revisions to the cropped data/cropping script, and expected test results. The automatic cropped example test must run without warnings. The results of the full scale version is shared with the development team in the PR comments.
To help understand this case, the inclusion of example_psrc as an agency example is discussed. Example_psrc is PSRC’s experimentation of a two zone model and is useful for testing the two zone features, including runtime. A snapshot of PSRC’s efforts to setup an ActivitySim model with PSRC inputs was added to the test system as a new agency example, called example_psrc. After some back and forth between the development team and PSRC, a full scale version of example_psrc was successfully run. The revisions required to create a cropped version and full scale version were saved in a change log included with the example. When PSRC wants to update example_psrc, PSRC will pull the latest develop code branch and then update example_psrc so the cropped and full scale example both run without errors. PSRC also needs to update the expected test results. Once everything is in good working order, then PSRC issues a pull request to develop to pull their updated example. Once pulled, the automatic test system will run the cropped version of example_psrc.
When an agency example includes new submodels and/or contributions to the core that need to be reviewed and then pulled/accepted:
First, the agency example must comply with the steps outlined above under “When an agency wants to update their example”.
Second, the agency example must be up-to-date with the latest develop version of the code so the revisions to the code are only the exact revisions for the new submodels and/or contributions to the core.
The new submodels and/or contributions to the core will then be reviewed by the repository manager and it’s likely some revisions will be required for acceptance. Key items in the review include python code, user documentation, and testable examples for all new components. If the contribution is just new submodels, then the agency example that exercises the new submodel is sufficient for test coverage since TravisCI will automatically test the cropped version of the new submodel. If the contribution includes revisions to the core that impact other test examples, then the developer is responsible for ensuring all the other tests that are up-to-date are updated/passing as well. This includes other agency examples that are up-to-date. This is required to ensure the contribution to the core is adequately complete.
To help understand this case, the addition of the parking location choice model for example_arc is discussed. First, ARC gets their example in good working order - i.e. updates to develop, makes any required revisions to their model to get it working, creates a cropped and full scaled example, and creates the expected test results. In addition, this use case includes additional submodel and/or core code so ARC also authors the new feature, including documentation and any other relevant requirements such as logging, tracing, support for estimation, etc. With the new example and feature working offline, then ARC issues a pull request to add example_arc and the new submodel/core code and makes sure the automatic tests are passing. Once accepted, the automatic test system will run the test example tests and the cropped agency examples. Since the new feature - parking location choice model - is included in example_arc, then new feature is now tested. Any testing of downstream impacts from the parking location choice model would also need to be implemented in the example.